Last Update: Mar. 26, 2019, 5:14 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Previa and Volkswagen Eos

What is Better Toyota Previa or Volkswagen Eos?

Exterior

Toyota Previa Volkswagen Eos

11 reasons to buy Toyota Previa

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 88.5 mm vs 81 mm 8% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 96 mm vs 95.5 mm 1% or 0.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

154 bhp vs 140 bhp

115 kw. vs 103 kw.

9% or 14 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 26.19 mpg vs 47.11 mpg 80% or 20.92 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 32.51 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 74% or 23.95 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 19.5 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 81% or 15.78 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 76 liters vs 55 liters 28% or 21 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2355 kg vs 2010 kg 15% or 345 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 775 kg vs 462 kg 40% or 313 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1500 kg 6% or 100 kg
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 4 3

8 reasons to buy Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 9.6 48% or 8.9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More torque 320 nM vs 225 nM 30% or 95 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.4 sec. vs 11.4 sec. 1 sec.
More top speed 126 mph vs 112 mph 14 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 98 g/mile vs 161 g/mile 64% or 63 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 272 kg 64% or 478 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1548 kg vs 1580 kg 2% or 32 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.9 meters vs 11.2 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons Toyota Previa vs. Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5600 RPM vs 4000 RPM 29% or 1600 more rpms.
Engine capacity 2362 cm3 vs 1968 cm3 17% or 394 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4750 mm vs 4407 mm 7% or 343 mm shorter
Width 1790 mm vs 1791 mm 0% or 1 mm narrower
Height 1770 mm vs 1437 mm 19% or 333 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2900 mm vs 2578 mm 11% or 322 mm more
Front tires size 215/60 R16 vs 215/55 R16
Rear tires size 215/60 R16 vs 215/55 R16
Spare wheel 215/60 R16 vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 spokes vs ADELAIDE
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)