Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Previa and Volvo V60

What is Better Toyota Previa or Volvo V60?

Exterior

Toyota Previa Volvo V60

10 reasons to buy Toyota Previa

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 88.5 mm vs 79 mm 11% or 9.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 96 mm vs 81.4 mm 15% or 14.6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 26.19 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 61% or 16.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 32.51 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 55% or 17.92 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 19.5 mpg vs 32.51 mpg 67% or 13.01 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 76 liters vs 67.5 liters 11% or 8.5 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2355 kg vs 2100 kg 11% or 255 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 775 kg vs 530 kg 32% or 245 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

9 reasons to buy Volvo V60

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.6 4% or 0.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

180 bhp vs 154 bhp

132 kw. vs 115 kw.

14% or 26 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 240 nM vs 225 nM 6% or 15 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.5 sec. vs 11.4 sec. 2.9 sec.
More top speed 137 mph vs 112 mph 25 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 161 g/mile 66% or 64 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 272 kg 64% or 478 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1570 kg vs 1580 kg 1% or 10 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Toyota Previa vs. Volvo V60

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5600 RPM vs 5700 RPM 2% or 100 less rpms.
Engine capacity 2362 cm3 vs 1595 cm3 32% or 767 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4750 mm vs 4628 mm 3% or 122 mm shorter
Width 1790 mm vs 1865 mm 4% or 75 mm narrower
Height 1770 mm vs 1484 mm 16% or 286 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2900 mm vs 2776 mm 4% or 124 mm more
Front tires size 215/60 R16 vs 215/50 R17
Rear tires size 215/60 R16 vs 215/50 R17
Spare wheel 215/60 R16 vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 spokes vs BALDER
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)