Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Starlet and Volvo XC90

What is Better Toyota Starlet or Volvo XC90?

Exterior

Toyota Starlet Volvo XC90

4 reasons to buy Toyota Starlet

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 11.9 sec. vs 12.3 sec. 0.4 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 101 g/mile vs 149 g/mile 48% or 48 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 830 kg vs 2049 kg 147% or 1219 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.2 meters vs 12.5 meters 36% or 3.3 meters

16 reasons to buy Volvo XC90

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 18.0 vs 9.6 47% or 8.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 81 mm vs 74 mm 9% or 7 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 77.4 mm 17% or 15.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

163 bhp vs 74 bhp

120 kw. vs

55% or 89 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
More top speed 115 mph vs 103 mph 12 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 31.38 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 32% or 10.1 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.19 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 32% or 12.24 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.91 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 34% or 8.2 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 3 vs EURO 2 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 249 liters vs 214 liters 14% or 35 liters
More maximum trunk space 1837 liters vs 214 liters 88% or 1623 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 68 liters vs 45 liters 34% or 23 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2250 kg vs 900 kg 60% or 1350 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons Toyota Starlet vs. Volvo XC90

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1332 cm3 vs 2401 cm3 45% or 1069 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3740 mm vs 4798 mm 22% or 1058 mm shorter
Width 1635 mm vs 1898 mm 14% or 263 mm narrower
Height 1378 mm vs 1743 mm 21% or 365 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2300 mm vs 2857 mm 19% or 557 mm less
Front tires size 195/45 R15 vs 235/65 R17
Rear tires size 195/45 R15 vs 235/65 R17
Spare wheel 195/45 R15 vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)