Last Update: Jun. 17, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Ford Mustang

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Ford Mustang?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Ford Mustang

4 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 314 liters vs 220 liters 30% or 94 liters
More maximum trunk space 749 liters vs 220 liters 71% or 529 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1566 kg 37% or 426 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.70 meters 6% or 0.7 meters

8 reasons to buy Ford Mustang

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

218 bhp vs 101 bhp

158 kw. vs 74 kw.

54% or 117 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 386 nM vs 132 nM 66% or 254 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.50 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 6 sec.
More top speed 134 mph vs 109 mph 25 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 25.99 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 94% or 24.44 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 31.01 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 82% or 25.45 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 111% or 22.22 mpg

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Ford Mustang

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6000 RPM vs 4200 RPM 30% or 1800 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1329 cm3 vs 4942 cm3 73% or 3613 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 4 2 more
Dimensions
Length 3930 mm vs 4610 mm 15% or 680 mm shorter
Width 1725 mm vs 1823 mm 5% or 98 mm narrower
Height 1525 mm vs 1341 mm 12% or 184 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2460 mm vs 2553 mm 4% or 93 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R16 vs 225/55R16
Rear tires size 195/60 R16 vs 225/55R16
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)