Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Mazda CX-9

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Mazda CX-9?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Mazda CX-9

4 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 192 g/mile 140% or 112 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 314 liters vs 267 liters 15% or 47 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 2040 kg 79% or 900 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.40 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

14 reasons to buy Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

273 bhp vs 101 bhp

198 kw. vs 74 kw.

63% or 172 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 366 nM vs 132 nM 64% or 234 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.10 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 2.4 sec.
More top speed 112 mph vs 109 mph 3 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.99 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 129% or 28.44 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 28.99 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 95% or 27.47 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 15 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 181% or 27.22 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1911 liters vs 749 liters 61% or 1162 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2712 kg vs 1590 kg 41% or 1122 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 672 kg vs 450 kg 33% or 222 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 550 kg 27% or 200 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 800 kg 50% or 800 kg

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6000 RPM vs 6250 RPM 4% or 250 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1329 cm3 vs 3726 cm3 64% or 2397 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3930 mm vs 5089 mm 23% or 1159 mm shorter
Width 1725 mm vs 1936 mm 11% or 211 mm narrower
Height 1525 mm vs 1728 mm 12% or 203 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2460 mm vs 2875 mm 14% or 415 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R16 vs 245/50R20
Rear tires size 195/60 R16 vs 245/50R20
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)