Last Update: Jun. 17, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Volkswagen Eos

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volkswagen Eos?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Volkswagen Eos

16 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 11.5 38% or 7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 81 mm vs 72.5 mm 10% or 8.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 80.5 mm 16% or 15 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

140 bhp vs 101 bhp

103 kw. vs 74 kw.

28% or 39 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 132 nM 59% or 188 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.4 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 2.1 sec.
More top speed 126 mph vs 109 mph 17 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.11 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 7% or 3.32 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.28 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 20% or 6.94 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 380 liters vs 314 liters 17% or 66 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 42 liters 24% or 13 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2010 kg vs 1590 kg 21% or 420 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 462 kg vs 450 kg 3% or 12 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 550 kg 27% or 200 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 800 kg 47% or 700 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.9 meters vs 11 meters 1% or 0.1 meters

6 reasons to buy Volkswagen Eos

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 98 g/mile 23% or 18 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 99441 miles vs 62150 miles 38% or 37291 miles
More standard warranty - Years 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1548 kg 36% or 408 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1968 cm3 vs 1329 cm3 32% or 639 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4407 mm vs 3930 mm 11% or 477 mm shorter
Width 1791 mm vs 1725 mm 4% or 66 mm wider
Height 1437 mm vs 1525 mm 6% or 88 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2578 mm vs 2460 mm 5% or 118 mm more
Front tires size 215/55 R16 vs 195/60 R16
Rear tires size 215/55 R16 vs 195/60 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels ADELAIDE vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)