Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Volvo 264

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo 264?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Volvo 264

2 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 749 liters vs 395 liters 47% or 354 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1350 kg 18% or 210 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

155 bhp vs 101 bhp

112 kw. vs 74 kw.

35% or 54 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 230 nM vs 132 nM 43% or 98 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.00 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 2.5 sec.
More top speed 115 mph vs 109 mph 6 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 395 liters vs 314 liters 21% or 81 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1925 kg vs 1590 kg 17% or 335 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 575 kg vs 450 kg 22% or 125 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 650 kg vs 550 kg 15% or 100 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 800 kg 47% or 700 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 9.80 meters vs 11 meters 12% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6000 RPM vs 5500 RPM 8% or 500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1329 cm3 vs 2849 cm3 53% or 1520 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3930 mm vs 4785 mm 18% or 855 mm shorter
Width 1725 mm vs 1707 mm 1% or 18 mm wider
Height 1525 mm vs 1430 mm 6% or 95 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2460 mm vs 2640 mm 7% or 180 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R16 vs 185/70HR14
Rear tires size 195/60 R16 vs 185/70HR14
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)