What is better Ford Puma or Toyota Verso?


Look at match of Ford Puma vs. Toyota Verso by vital specs. There are 10 vital ideas why Ford Puma is undoubtedly a more reasonable choice than Toyota Verso. Toyota Verso also has got 5 reasons to pick it forgetting about Ford Puma. By looking at the most important specs, we came up with evident distinctions between Ford Puma and Toyota Verso. Choose acceleration or horse powers, look at length, and conveniently compare two cars. Puma provides all the usual advantages of Ford. But Verso is hard to call a worse model, as Toyota invested a lot of efforts in the development. After summarizing all the information, you'll quickly figure out which car to get.


Ford Puma
Toyota Verso
Ford Puma
Toyota Verso

10 reasons to buy the Ford Puma

  1. More engine power
    10% or 13 hp more. The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars go faster.
    125 hp / 92 kW engine power 112 hp / 82 kW engine power
  2. Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
    2.7 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 12.7 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
  3. Higher top speed
    11 km/h more. The higher the top speed, the faster the car travels on the highway.
    191 km/h / 119 mph top speed 180 km/h / 112 mph top speed
  4. Faster acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
    27% or 2.7 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh 12.7 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
  5. Less fuel consumption (highway)
    2% or 0.1 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the pollution-causing emissions. Also, drivers save money by using an economical car.
    4.0-4.1 L/100 km / 58.8 mpg fuel consumption (highway) 4.1 L/100 km / 57.4 mpg fuel consumption (highway)
  6. Fewer CO2 emissions
    16% or 16 g/km less. The less CO2 emission the vehicle releases, the less damage to the environment it causes.
    103-106 g/km / 166g/mile CO2 emissions 119 g/km / 192g/mile CO2 emissions
  7. More minimum boot capacity
    7% or 39 l more. The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    523 L minimum boot capacity 484 L minimum boot capacity
  8. Fewer weight
    26% or 315 kg less. The weight of the vehicle affects fuel consumption, acceleration dynamics, braking distance, etc.
    1205 kg / 2654 lbs weight 1520-1620 kg / 3348 lbs weight
  9. More permitted towbar download
    27% or 20 kg more. The more permitted download of the towbar, the heavier loads the vehicle can tow without any risk of breakdown.
    75 kg / 165 lbs permitted towbar download 55 kg / 121 lbs permitted towbar download
  10. Shorter wheelbase
    7% or 192 mm shorter. The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter-wheelbase cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
    2588 mm wheelbase 2780 mm wheelbase

5 reasons to buy the Toyota Verso

  1. More cylinders
    1 more cylinder. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
    3 cylinders 4 cylinders
  2. More torque
    37% or 100 Nm more. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
    170 Nm @ 1400 rpm. torque 270 Nm @ 2000 rpm. torque
  3. Less fuel consumption (city)
    2% or 0.1 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the more economical it is to drive the vehicle. Also, economical cars are more environmentally friendly.
    5.4-5.5 L/100 km / 43.6 mpg fuel consumption (city) 5.3 L/100 km / 44.4 mpg fuel consumption (city)
  4. Greater fuel tank capacity
    24% or 13 l more. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
    42 l fuel tank capacity 55 l fuel tank capacity
  5. More maximum towing weight with brakes
    15% or 200 kg more. The greater the permitted trailer load with brakes, the more the vehicle can tow larger and heavier trailers without damaging the engine.
    1100 kg / 2423 lbs maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg / 2863 lbs maximum towing weight with brakes

Neutral comparisons between the Ford Puma and the Toyota Verson

  1. Engine position
    Front, Transverse Engine position Front, Transverse Engine position
  2. Fuel supply
    Direct injection Fuel supply Diesel Commonrail Fuel supply
  3. Maximum allowable weight
    the Toyota Verso is 22% or 500 kg heavier
    1760-1765 kg / 3877 lbs Maximum allowable weight 2260 kg / 4978 lbs Maximum allowable weight
  4. Doors
    5 Doors 5 Doors
  5. Length
    the Toyota Verso is 6% or 274 mm longer
    4186 mm Length 4460 mm Length
  6. Width
    the Ford Puma is 15 mm wider
    1805 mm Width 1790 mm Width
  7. Height
    the Toyota Verso is 5% or 84 mm higher
    1536 mm Height 1620-1630 mm Height
  8. Front tire size
    215/55 R17; 215/50 R Front tire size 205/60 R16; 215/55 R Front tire size
  9. Wheel rim size
    7J x 17; 7J x 18 Wheel rim size 6.5J x 16; 7.0J x 17 Wheel rim size
Engine and transmission
cylinders
3
cylinders
4
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Engine position
Front, Transverse
gears manual transmission
6
gears manual transmission
6
Performance
engine power
125 hp @ 6000 rpm.
92kW
engine power
112 hp
82kW
torque
170 Nm @ 1400 rpm.
torque
270 Nm @ 2000 rpm.
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
10 sec
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
12.7 sec
top speed
191 km/h
119 mph
top speed
180 km/h
112 mph
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
10 sec
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
12.7 sec
Fuel consumption
fuel consumption (combined cycle)
4.5-4.6 l/100 km
52.3 mpg
fuel consumption (combined cycle)
4.5 l/100 km
52.3 mpg
fuel consumption (highway)
4.0-4.1 l/100 km
58.8 mpg
fuel consumption (highway)
4.1 l/100 km
57.4 mpg
fuel consumption (city)
5.4-5.5 l/100 km
43.6 mpg
fuel consumption (city)
5.3 l/100 km
44.4 mpg
fuel tank capacity
42 l
fuel tank capacity
55 l
Fuel supply
Direct injection
Fuel supply
Diesel Commonrail
Emissions
CO2 emissions
103-106 g/km
166g/mile
CO2 emissions
119 g/km
192g/mile
european emission standard
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-IS
european emission standard
Euro 6 w
Weight and capacity
minimum boot capacity
523 l
minimum boot capacity
484 l
Maximum allowable weight
1760-1765 kg
3877 lbs
Maximum allowable weight
2260 kg
4978 lbs
maximum towing weight without brakes
640 kg
1410 lbs
maximum towing weight without brakes
450 kg
991 lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
1100 kg
2423 lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
1300 kg
2863 lbs
weight
1205 kg
2654 lbs
weight
1520-1620 kg
3348 lbs
seats
5
seats
5-7
permitted towbar download
75 kg
165 lbs
permitted towbar download
55 kg
121 lbs
Other specs
turning radius
10.4 m
turning radius
11.6 m
Doors
5
Doors
5
Dimensions
Length
4186 mm
Length
4460 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1790 mm
Height
1536 mm
Height
1620-1630 mm
wheelbase
2588 mm
wheelbase
2780 mm
Wheels and tires
Front tire size
215/55 R17; 215/50 R
Front tire size
205/60 R16; 215/55 R
Wheel rim size
7J x 17; 7J x 18
Wheel rim size
6.5J x 16; 7.0J x 17
View full list
Look at match of Ford Puma vs. Toyota Verso by vital specs. There are 10 vital ideas why Ford Puma is undoubtedly a more reasonable choice than Toyota Verso. Toyota Verso also has got 5 reasons to pick it forgetting about Ford Puma. By looking at the most important specs, we came up with evident distinctions between Ford Puma and Toyota Verso. Choose acceleration or horse powers, look at length, and conveniently compare two cars. Puma provides all the usual advantages of Ford. But Verso is hard to call a worse model, as Toyota invested a lot of efforts in the development. After summarizing all the information, you'll quickly figure out which car to get.

Comparison of Ford Puma and Toyota Verso: conclusions and opinions

It's important to review Ford Puma and Toyota Verso by looking at technical sides. Take 2-3 minutes to learn all facts about the cars. We gathered the facts about Toyota Verso and Ford Puma in tables that are easy to look through and understand.

General Review of Ford Puma vs. Toyota Verso

We'll start with a review of the important specs of the models. There was a time when Ford sold quite a lot of Puma vehicles. Often, drivers still bought the Verso built by Toyota. The size of the vehicles is an interesting feature to review. For Toyota Verso, the sizes are as follows: 1620-1630 mm in height, 4460 mm in length, and 1790 mm wide. The wheelbase is 2588 mm for Ford Puma vs. 2780 mm for Toyota Verso.

Now let's look at motors. Ford Puma offers 3 cylinders engine with 125 hp @ 6000 rpm. capacity. Drivers of Toyota Verso are able to get 112 hp of output, as it's a simple 4 -cylinder engine. Ford Puma actually needs 9.5 sec for running at 60 miles per hour, Toyota Verso needs 12.1 sec to get the same results. Ford Puma will run up to a speed of 191 km/h, in comparison with 180 km/h max speed of Verso.

Safety of Ford Puma in comparison with Toyota Verso

These models are considered to be really safe. The new technology of Ford defends owners and passengers in Ford Puma. International examinations agree that Puma is a safe model. Toyota Verso offers wonderful safety for people outside. The car was actually a reviews winner and made Toyota popular. In addition, Verso has got efficient braking and steering systems for enhanced safety.

Conclusion and opinions

Anyway, Ford Puma and Toyota Verso both receive many wonderful comments. There are plenty of buyers volunteering to pay for these cars. We found 10 factors to buy Puma and 5 reasons to go for Verso. Be fair when thinking about the pros and cons of Ford and Toyota.