What is better Volvo XC70 or Citroen Evasion?

Choosing of Citroen Evasion vs Volvo XC70 could become difficult, so it's time to make comparison of them. You can see 11 vital reasons why Volvo XC70 is surely a more reasonable purchase than Citroen Evasion. Citroen Evasion anyway shows 6 ideas to buy it rather than Volvo XC70. By examining the most valuable features, we found key differences between Volvo XC70 and Citroen Evasion. You will compare two cars and form your personal opinion about them. The freshest technologies of Volvo are hidden in XC70. Motorists say that Citroen also did much to turn Evasion into a great success. If you had the possibility, which vehicle would you go for?
Volvo XC70
Citroen Evasion
Volvo XC70
Citroen Evasion

11 reasons to buy the Volvo XC70

  1. More cylinders
    1 more cylinder. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
    5 cylinders 4 cylinders
  2. More engine power
    33% or 54 hp more. The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars go faster.
    163 hp / 120 kW engine power 109 hp / 80 kW engine power
  3. More torque
    53% or 210 Nm more. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
    400 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm torque 190 Nm @ 4100 rpm. torque
  4. Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
    5 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10.2 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 15.2 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
  5. Higher top speed
    30 km/h more. The higher the top speed, the faster the car travels on the highway.
    205 km/h / 127 mph top speed 175 km/h / 109 mph top speed
  6. Faster acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
    49% or 5 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10.2 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh 15.2 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
  7. Less fuel consumption (combined cycle)
    23% or 1.6 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the exhaust emitted into the air. Economical cars are also more efficient to drive.
    5.3 L/100 km / 44.4 mpg fuel consumption (combined cycle) 6.9 L/100 km / 34.1 mpg fuel consumption (combined cycle)
  8. Less fuel consumption (highway)
    24% or 1.4 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the pollution-causing emissions. Also, drivers save money by using an economical car.
    4.5 L/100 km / 52.3 mpg fuel consumption (highway) 5.9 L/100 km / 39.9 mpg fuel consumption (highway)
  9. Less fuel consumption (city)
    23% or 2 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the more economical it is to drive the vehicle. Also, economical cars are more environmentally friendly.
    6.8 L/100 km / 34.6 mpg fuel consumption (city) 8.8 L/100 km / 26.7 mpg fuel consumption (city)
  10. More minimum boot capacity
    41% or 235 l more. The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    575 L minimum boot capacity 340 L minimum boot capacity
  11. Shorter wheelbase
    10 mm shorter. The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter-wheelbase cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
    2815 mm wheelbase 2825 mm wheelbase

6 reasons to buy the Citroen Evasion

  1. Better compression
    8% or 1.5 more. The higher the compression ratio, the less fuel is required to achieve the same power. This can affect the engine's efficiency.
    16.5 compression 18 compression
  2. Piston stroke longer
    13% or 11 mm longer. The longer the piston stroke, the better the engine’s fuel combustion efficiency. This reduces fuel consumption and creates a more environmentally-friendly engine.
    77 mm Piston stroke 88 mm Piston stroke
  3. Larger cylinder bore
    5% or 4 mm more. The larger the cylinder bore, the better the combustion chamber fills. This provides power but can also increase engine emissions.
    81 mm cylinder bore 85 mm cylinder bore
  4. More engine capacity
    1% or 13 cc more The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans.
    1984 cc engine capacity 1997 cc engine capacity
  5. Greater fuel tank capacity
    13% or 10 l more. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
    70 l fuel tank capacity 80 l fuel tank capacity
  6. More maximum trunk space
    52% or 1700 l more. The greater the trunk capacity, the more items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    1600 L maximum trunk space 3300 L maximum trunk space

Neutral comparisons between the Volvo XC70 and the Citroen Evasionn

  1. Engine position
    Front, Transverse Engine position Front, Transverse Engine position
  2. Cylinders location
    Inline Cylinders location Inline Cylinders location
  3. Fuel supply
    Diesel Commonrail Fuel supply Diesel Commonrail Fuel supply
  4. Doors
    5 Doors 5 Doors
  5. Length
    the Volvo XC70 is 383 mm longer
    4838 mm Length 4455 mm Length
  6. Width
    the Volvo XC70 is 50 mm wider
    1870 mm Width 1820 mm Width
  7. Height
    the Citroen Evasion is 6% or 111 mm higher
    1604 mm Height 1715 mm Height
  8. Front tire size
    215/65 R16 Front tire size 205/65 R15 Front tire size
Engine and transmission
cylinders
5
cylinders
4
valves per cylinder
4
valves per cylinder
4
compression
16.5
compression
18
Piston stroke
77 mm
Piston stroke
88 mm
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Cylinders location
Inline
Cylinders location
Inline
cylinder bore
81 mm
cylinder bore
85 mm
Performance
engine power
163 hp @ 3500 rpm.
120kW
engine power
109 hp @ 4000 rpm.
80kW
torque
400 Nm @ 1500-2750 Rpm
torque
190 Nm @ 4100 rpm.
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
10.2 sec
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
15.2 sec
top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
top speed
175 km/h
109 mph
engine capacity
1984 cc
engine capacity
1997 cc
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
10.2 sec
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
15.2 sec
Fuel consumption
fuel consumption (combined cycle)
5.3 l/100 km
44.4 mpg
fuel consumption (combined cycle)
6.9 l/100 km
34.1 mpg
fuel consumption (highway)
4.5 l/100 km
52.3 mpg
fuel consumption (highway)
5.9 l/100 km
39.9 mpg
fuel consumption (city)
6.8 l/100 km
34.6 mpg
fuel consumption (city)
8.8 l/100 km
26.7 mpg
fuel tank capacity
70 l
fuel tank capacity
80 l
Fuel supply
Diesel Commonrail
Fuel supply
Diesel Commonrail
Weight and capacity
minimum boot capacity
575 l
minimum boot capacity
340 l
maximum trunk space
1600 l
maximum trunk space
3300 l
seats
5
seats
5
Other specs
Doors
5
Doors
5
Dimensions
Length
4838 mm
Length
4455 mm
Width
1870 mm
Width
1820 mm
Height
1604 mm
Height
1715 mm
wheelbase
2815 mm
wheelbase
2825 mm
Wheels and tires
Front tire size
215/65 R16
Front tire size
205/65 R15
View full list
Choosing of Citroen Evasion vs Volvo XC70 could become difficult, so it's time to make comparison of them. You can see 11 vital reasons why Volvo XC70 is surely a more reasonable purchase than Citroen Evasion. Citroen Evasion anyway shows 6 ideas to buy it rather than Volvo XC70. By examining the most valuable features, we found key differences between Volvo XC70 and Citroen Evasion. You will compare two cars and form your personal opinion about them. The freshest technologies of Volvo are hidden in XC70. Motorists say that Citroen also did much to turn Evasion into a great success. If you had the possibility, which vehicle would you go for?

Comparison of Volvo XC70 and Citroen Evasion: conclusions and opinions

So let's learn some outstanding information about Citroen Evasion and Volvo XC70. The most prominent specs are compared in this comparison. Review is separated into some paragraphs to make learning about Citroen Evasion and Volvo XC70 comfortable.

General Review of Volvo XC70 vs. Citroen Evasion

We'll start with checking of the important specs of the vehicles. Volvo created XC70 as the major contestant in the sphere. Often, buyers still preferred the Evasion produced by Citroen. The size of the cars is an interesting thing to review. Citroen Evasion offers 4455 mm in length and 1820 mm in width, and the model is 1715 mm high. Speaking about wheelbase, Volvo XC70 has 2815 mm while Citroen Evasion has got 2825 mm of base length.

We want to compare the engine specs of the vehicles. Volvo XC70 offers 5 cylinders engine with 163 hp @ 3500 rpm. capacity. Owners of Citroen Evasion only get 109 hp @ 4000 rpm. of power, as it's a simple 4 -cylinder motor. If you drive Citroen Evasion, you'll speed up to 60 mph after 14.4 sec, and Volvo XC70 copes with this speed level for 9.7 sec . Also, don't forget about the maximum speed of 205 km/h for XC70 and match it to 175 km/h for Evasion.

Safety of Volvo XC70 in comparison with Citroen Evasion

For both producers, safe use became a primary factor when engineering vehicles. For Volvo XC70, safety technologies were an important stage of production, and Volvo did the best it could. Safety testing systems also add that XC70 has got wonderful safety. Makers of Citroen Evasion pay a lot of attention to people safety. It has all the modern features implemented by Citroen and was a leader in numerous reviews. Also, drivers find that Evasion offers marvelous steering and breaking.

Conclusion and opinions

It's hard to know if Citroen Evasion takes a lead in contention with Volvo XC70. The models are of different kind and have got their own adorers. Consider XC70 browsing 11 obvious advantages to get it, but think also about the 6 privileges of Evasion. Deciding between Volvo and Citroen won't be extremely difficult for followers of the producers.
Like this content? Subscribe for updates! Submit!