Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 166 and Chrysler Sebring

What is Better Alfa Romeo 166 or Chrysler Sebring?

Comparing Alfa Romeo 166 with Chrysler Sebring can help people decide which vehicle is better. The comparison came up with 13 ideas to purchase Alfa Romeo 166 - it's winning Chrysler Sebring, according to the specs. Nevertheless, Chrysler Sebring offers 10 weighty advantages that turn it into good choice instead of Alfa Romeo 166. The review of Alfa Romeo 166 with Chrysler Sebring takes into account every important point and sums up information. Compare steering or horse powers, measure size, and comfortably compare two cars. The best ideas of Alfa Romeo are included in 166.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 166 Chrysler Sebring

13 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 166

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.9 1% or 0.1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 78.5 mm 14% or 12.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.8 sec. vs 10 sec. 0.2 sec.
More top speed 131 mph vs 121 mph 10 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 143 g/mile vs 154 g/mile 8% or 11 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 490 liters vs 356 liters 27% or 134 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 69 liters vs 64 liters 7% or 5 liters
More maximum bearing capacity 510 kg vs 355 kg 30% or 155 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 500 kg vs 450 kg 10% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1000 kg 33% or 500 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1420 kg vs 1820 kg 28% or 400 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

10 reasons to buy Chrysler Sebring

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 83 mm 3% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

185 bhp vs 150 bhp

138 kw. vs 110 kw.

19% or 35 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 255 nM vs 181 nM 29% or 74 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 26.91 mpg vs 29.1 mpg 8% or 2.19 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.7 mpg vs 38.69 mpg 5% or 1.99 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 18.6 mpg vs 20.5 mpg 10% or 1.9 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 2175 kg vs 1930 kg 11% or 245 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.13 meters vs 11.6 meters 4% or 0.47 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 166 vs. Chrysler Sebring

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6300 RPM vs 6400 RPM 2% or 100 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 2736 cm3 28% or 766 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4720 mm vs 4930 mm 4% or 210 mm shorter
Width 1800 mm vs 1843 mm 2% or 43 mm narrower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2765 mm 2% or 65 mm less
Front tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 215/55 R18
Rear tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 215/55 R18
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16 alloy wheels vs 18" aluminum
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)