Last Update: Apr. 03, 2020, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 166 and Peugeot 607

What is Better Alfa Romeo 166 or Peugeot 607?

Comparing Alfa Romeo 166 with Peugeot 607 may help buyers decide which car is more efficient. We came up with 11 ideas to buy Alfa Romeo 166 - it's above Peugeot 607, according to these arguments. Nevertheless, Peugeot 607 offers 11 important pluses that turn it into wonderful choice instead of Alfa Romeo 166. The comparison of Alfa Romeo 166 with Peugeot 607 considers every single point and summarizes data. 166 was produced by Alfa Romeo to outperform contestants on the market. Drivers admit that Peugeot also did much to turn 607 into a great success.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 166 Peugeot 607

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 166

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 88 mm 3% or 3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 136 bhp

110 kw. vs 100 kw.

9% or 14 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.8 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 1 sec.
More top speed 131 mph vs 128 mph 3 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 59% or 17.17 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.69 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 46% or 17.77 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20.5 mpg vs 34.81 mpg 70% or 14.31 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 71 dB vs 74.6 dB 5% or 3.6 dB
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 510 kg vs 418 kg 18% or 92 kg
More maximum roof load 80 kg vs 75 kg 6% or 5 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1420 kg vs 1665 kg 17% or 245 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More torque 320 nM vs 181 nM 43% or 139 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 101 g/mile vs 143 g/mile 42% or 42 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 509 liters vs 490 liters 4% or 19 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 69 liters 14% or 11 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2083 kg vs 1930 kg 7% or 153 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 500 kg 33% or 250 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1760 kg vs 1500 kg 15% or 260 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.4 meters vs 11.6 meters 2% or 0.2 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 166 vs. Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6300 RPM vs 4000 RPM 37% or 2300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 1% or 27 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4720 mm vs 4902 mm 4% or 182 mm shorter
Width 1800 mm vs 1826 mm 1% or 26 mm narrower
Height 1416 mm vs 1468 mm 4% or 52 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2800 mm 4% or 100 mm less
Front tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 225/50 R17
Rear tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 225/50 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs 225/50 R17
Type of wheels 16 alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)