Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Chevrolet Lacetti

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Chevrolet Lacetti?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Chevrolet Lacetti

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.8 vs 9.5 3% or 0.3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 84 mm vs 81.5 mm 3% or 2.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 108 bhp

88 kw. vs 80 kw.

10% or 12 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 206 nM vs 150 nM 27% or 56 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 11.4 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 116 mph 5 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 112 g/mile 20% or 19 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 1200 kg 8% or 100 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

6 reasons to buy Chevrolet Lacetti

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 79 mm vs 72 mm 9% or 7 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 36.2 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 22% or 7.91 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.11 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 21% or 9.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 27.9 mpg vs 33.62 mpg 21% or 5.72 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1250 kg vs 1280 kg 2% or 30 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.4 meters vs 10.9 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Chevrolet Lacetti

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 5800 RPM 14% or 800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 14% or 230 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4351 mm vs 4580 mm 5% or 229 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1725 mm 4% or 73 mm wider
Height 1465 mm vs 1460 mm 0% or 5 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2600 mm 1% or 34 mm more
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 195/55 R15
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 195/55 R15
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 15" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)