Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Maybach 62

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Maybach 62?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Maybach 62

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 3 1 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 9.8 vs 9.0 8% or 0.8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 218 g/mile 134% or 125 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Other specs
Less weight 1280 kg vs 2855 kg 123% or 1575 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.9 meters vs 14.8 meters 36% or 3.9 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

11 reasons to buy Maybach 62

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 12 vs 4 8 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 72 mm 12% or 10 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 87 mm vs 84 mm 3% or 3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

550 bhp vs 120 bhp

405 kw. vs 88 kw.

78% or 430 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 900 nM vs 206 nM 77% or 694 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.4 sec. vs 9.4 sec. 4 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 121 mph 34 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 17.8 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 148% or 26.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 25.71 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 107% or 27.56 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.5 mpg vs 33.62 mpg 192% or 22.12 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 110 liters vs 60 liters 45% or 50 liters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Maybach 62

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 5250 RPM 5% or 250 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 5513 cm3 75% or 4145 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V12
Camshaft DOHC vs QUAD CAM
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs With a twin-turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4351 mm vs 6165 mm 29% or 1814 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1980 mm 9% or 182 mm narrower
Height 1465 mm vs 1573 mm 7% or 108 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 3827 mm 31% or 1193 mm less
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 275/50 R19
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 275/50 R19
Spare wheel Compact vs 275/50 R19
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 19" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 double spokes vs 7 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)