Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Mercedes-Benz SLK

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Mercedes-Benz SLK?

Compare Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Mercedes-Benz SLK by vital features. The comparison found 2 ideas to go for Alfa Romeo Giulietta - it's winning Mercedes-Benz SLK, according to such specs. Although Mercedes-Benz SLK also possesses some advantages: get to know 7 points why it's better than Alfa Romeo Giulietta. The review of Alfa Romeo Giulietta with Mercedes-Benz SLK takes into account every needed factor and shows data. So we offer everyone compare two cars and find out which one you'd like to possess. Giulietta was developed by Alfa Romeo to win contestants in the sphere. Car owners agree that Mercedes-Benz also did much to turn SLK into a real success. Which of the cars in our match would you buy?


Alfa Romeo Giulietta Mercedes-Benz SLK

2 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 121 g/mile 30% or 28 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1280 kg vs 1690 kg 32% or 410 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

7 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz SLK

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

415 bhp vs 120 bhp

vs 88 kw.

71% or 295 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.5 sec. vs 9.4 sec. 4.9 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 121 mph 34 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 33.71 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 31% or 10.4 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 60 liters 14% or 10 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 10.9 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Mercedes-Benz SLK

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 5461 cm3 75% or 4093 cm3 less
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 7 1 less
Length 4351 mm vs 4134 mm 5% or 217 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 2006 mm 10% or 208 mm narrower
Height 1465 mm vs 1301 mm 11% or 164 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2430 mm 8% or 204 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)