Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Mitsubishi Pajero

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Mitsubishi Pajero?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Giulietta with Mitsubishi Pajero can help you make decision which car is worth buying. There are 5 huge arguments why Alfa Romeo Giulietta is surely a more advantageous buy than Mitsubishi Pajero. Although Mitsubishi Pajero also possesses some advantages: get to know 12 reasons why it's beating Alfa Romeo Giulietta. We can name important features of Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Mitsubishi Pajero that were used when matching. Giulietta includes all the usual advantages of Alfa Romeo. Although don't forget that Pajero presents the effective developments of Mitsubishi. The thorough review won't keep any hesitations about choosing a car.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Mitsubishi Pajero

5 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 2.3 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 110 mph 11 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 152 g/mile 63% or 59 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Other specs
Less weight 1280 kg vs 2085 kg 63% or 805 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

12 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Pajero

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.8 42% or 7.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 98.5 mm vs 72 mm 27% or 26.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 105 mm vs 84 mm 20% or 21 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

158 bhp vs 120 bhp

118 kw. vs 88 kw.

24% or 38 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 381 nM vs 206 nM 46% or 175 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.69 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 44% or 13.42 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 35.81 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 49% or 17.46 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 24.79 mpg vs 33.62 mpg 36% or 8.83 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 69 liters vs 60 liters 13% or 9 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2800 kg vs 1300 kg 54% or 1500 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 10.9 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Mitsubishi Pajero

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 3800 RPM 24% or 1200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 3200 cm3 57% or 1832 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4351 mm vs 4385 mm 1% or 34 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1875 mm 4% or 77 mm narrower
Height 1465 mm vs 1880 mm 22% or 415 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2545 mm 3% or 89 mm more
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 265/65 R17
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 265/65 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs 265/65 R17
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)