Last Update: Apr. 02, 2020, 5:43 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Skoda Yeti

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Skoda Yeti?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Giulietta with Skoda Yeti might help people make it clear which car is more efficient. There are 12 huge arguments why Alfa Romeo Giulietta is actually a more sensible buy than Skoda Yeti. Nevertheless, Skoda Yeti provides 4 weighty benefits that make it wonderful purchase instead of Alfa Romeo Giulietta. Our team gathered information about the models to present a full comparison of Skoda Yeti with Alfa Romeo Giulietta. Choose safety or power, measure wheel base, and comfortably compare two cars. The detailed comparison cant leave any questions about buying a car.


Alfa Romeo Giulietta Skoda Yeti

12 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 72 mm vs 71 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 84 mm vs 75.6 mm 10% or 8.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 105 bhp

88 kw. vs 77 kw.

13% or 15 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 206 nM vs 175 nM 15% or 31 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 2.4 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 109 mph 12 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 33.62 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 11% or 3.6 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 55 liters 8% or 5 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 1200 kg 8% or 100 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1280 kg vs 1340 kg 5% or 60 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

4 reasons to buy Skoda Yeti

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.8 2% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 47.87 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 11% or 5.4 mpg
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 10.9 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Skoda Yeti

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1197 cm3 13% or 171 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4351 mm vs 4223 mm 3% or 128 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1793 mm 0% or 5 mm wider
Height 1465 mm vs 1644 mm 11% or 179 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2578 mm 2% or 56 mm more
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 215/60 R16
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 215/60 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs repair kit
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)