Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo GT and Volvo C30

What is Better Alfa Romeo GT or Volvo C30?

Look at comparison Alfa Romeo GT vs. Volvo C30 by key characteristics. Our comparison shows 8 ideas which make Alfa Romeo GT better than Volvo C30. Also, Volvo C30 offers 16 weighty benefits that turn it into great choice instead of Alfa Romeo GT. By examining the most prominent features, we revealed key distinctions of Alfa Romeo GT and Volvo C30. You will compare two cars and form your own opinion about vehicles. The most effective technologies of Alfa Romeo are presented in GT. But don't forget that C30 has got the unique technologies of Volvo. Which of the vehicles in our review would you pay for?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo GT Volvo C30

8 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo GT

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18 vs 9.0 50% or 9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 103 g/mile vs 129 g/mile 25% or 26 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 63 liters vs 62 liters 2% or 1 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1885 kg vs 1840 kg 2% or 45 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 493 kg 5% or 27 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.5 meters vs 11.6 meters 1% or 0.1 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

16 reasons to buy Volvo C30

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 82 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 90.4 mm 3% or 2.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

220 bhp vs 150 bhp

162 kw. vs 110 kw.

32% or 70 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 305 nM 5% or 15 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.7 sec. vs 9.6 sec. 2.9 sec.
More top speed 149 mph vs 130 mph 19 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.51 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 40% or 13.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 43.46 mpg vs 57.56 mpg 32% or 14.1 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 33.19 mpg 47% or 10.58 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 364 liters vs 320 liters 12% or 44 liters
More maximum trunk space 1010 liters vs 905 liters 10% or 105 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 400 kg 43% or 300 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1300 kg 13% or 200 kg
More maximum roof load 75 kg vs 50 kg 33% or 25 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1347 kg vs 1365 kg 1% or 18 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo GT vs. Volvo C30

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1910 cm3 vs 2521 cm3 24% or 611 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4489 mm vs 4252 mm 5% or 237 mm shorter
Width 1763 mm vs 1782 mm 1% or 19 mm narrower
Height 1366 mm vs 1447 mm 6% or 81 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2596 mm vs 2640 mm 2% or 44 mm less
Front tires size 255/40 R18 vs 215/45 R18
Rear tires size 255/40 R18 vs 215/45 R18
Spare wheel Compact vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels 18" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 spokes vs ATREUS
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)