Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo GTV and Chrysler Neon

What is Better Alfa Romeo GTV or Chrysler Neon?

Comparing Alfa Romeo GTV with Chrysler Neon might help people decide which car is better. We found 15 vital arguments why Alfa Romeo GTV is surely a more reasonable buy than Chrysler Neon. Chrysler Neon also offers 7 ideas to purchase it instead of Alfa Romeo GTV. By examining the most valuable features, we found key distinctions between Alfa Romeo GTV and Chrysler Neon. Car owners agree that Chrysler really did everything to turn Neon into a real success.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo GTV Chrysler Neon

15 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo GTV

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 10.5 vs 9.8 7% or 0.7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 93 mm vs 87.5 mm 6% or 5.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

240 bhp vs 131 bhp

176 kw. vs 96 kw.

45% or 109 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 289 nM vs 178 nM 38% or 111 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.3 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 4.5 sec.
More top speed 158 mph vs 124 mph 34 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.4 mpg vs 25.91 mpg 21% or 4.51 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 30.41 mpg vs 44.78 mpg 47% or 14.37 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 14.2 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 148% or 21.08 mpg
Emissions
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 47 liters 33% or 23 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1855 kg vs 1650 kg 11% or 205 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 485 kg vs 405 kg 16% or 80 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years

7 reasons to buy Chrysler Neon

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 83 mm vs 72.6 mm 13% or 10.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 117 g/mile vs 196 g/mile 68% or 79 g/mile
Less noise level 71 dB vs 73 dB 3% or 2 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 371 liters vs 155 liters 58% or 216 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1245 kg vs 1370 kg 10% or 125 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 12 meters 11% or 1.2 meters
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo GTV vs. Chrysler Neon

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 5600 RPM 10% or 600 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3179 cm3 vs 1996 cm3 37% or 1183 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location V6 vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4299 mm vs 4390 mm 2% or 91 mm shorter
Width 1776 mm vs 1715 mm 3% or 61 mm wider
Height 1318 mm vs 1421 mm 7% or 103 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2667 mm 5% or 127 mm less
Front tires size 225/45 ZR17 91Y vs 185/60 R15
Rear tires size 225/45 ZR17 91Y vs 185/60 R15
Spare wheel Compact (saving space) vs Compact (saving space)
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 15" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)