Last Update: Mar. 31, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Aston Martin Vantage

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Aston Martin Vantage?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Aston Martin Vantage

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 222 g/mile 147% or 132 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1630 kg 42% or 485 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 2 3

15 reasons to buy Aston Martin Vantage

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 11.3 vs 9.8 13% or 1.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 89 mm vs 72 mm 19% or 17 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 84 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

380 bhp vs 120 bhp

283 kw. vs 88 kw.

68% or 260 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 206 nM 50% or 204 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.9 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 3.9 sec.
More top speed 175 mph vs 123 mph 52 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 16.4 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 182% or 29.87 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 22.61 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 150% or 33.85 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.2 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 212% or 23.71 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 300 liters vs 270 liters 10% or 30 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 45 liters 44% or 35 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 10 years vs 8 years 20% or 2 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 11.3 meters 2% or 0.2 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Aston Martin Vantage

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 7000 RPM 29% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 4282 cm3 68% or 2914 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V8
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4380 mm 7% or 317 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1865 mm 8% or 145 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1255 mm 13% or 191 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2600 mm 3% or 89 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 235/45 R18
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 275/40 R18
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)