Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Chevrolet Aveo

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Chevrolet Aveo?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Chevrolet Aveo will help buyers make it clear which car is worth buying. We revealed 4 factors to purchase Alfa Romeo Mito - it's winning Chevrolet Aveo, according to such specs. But Chevrolet Aveo also has many pluses: look at 6 factors why it's better than Alfa Romeo Mito. By examining the most prominent features, we revealed the main distinctions between Alfa Romeo Mito and Chevrolet Aveo. You will compare two cars and form your own view about them. The best ideas of Alfa Romeo are hidden in Mito. Anyway Aveo is uneasy to call a less worthy vehicle, as Chevrolet invested a great deal of efforts in the development. Which of the contestants in our match would you choose?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Chevrolet Aveo

4 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
More engine power

120 bhp vs 84 bhp

88 kw. vs

30% or 36 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 13.0 sec. 4.2 sec.
More top speed 123 mph vs 106 mph 17 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 47.2 mpg 2% or 0.93 mpg

6 reasons to buy Chevrolet Aveo

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 5% or 4 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 290 liters vs 270 liters 7% or 20 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 46 liters vs 45 liters 2% or 1 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1070 kg vs 1145 kg 7% or 75 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 11.3 meters 13% or 1.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Chevrolet Aveo

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1229 cm3 10% or 139 cm3 more
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4039 mm 1% or 24 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1735 mm 1% or 15 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1517 mm 5% or 71 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2525 mm 1% or 14 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)