Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Citroen C3 Picasso

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Citroen C3 Picasso?

Compare Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Citroen C3 Picasso by key features. There are 9 vital reasons why Alfa Romeo Mito is undoubtedly a more advantageous purchase than Citroen C3 Picasso. For plenty of motorists, Citroen C3 Picasso can still be a better choice than Alfa Romeo Mito as it shows 7 ideas of it. By looking at the most valuable features, we came up with the main distinctions of Alfa Romeo Mito and Citroen C3 Picasso. Choose acceleration or efficiency, match wheel base, and conveniently compare two cars. Mito offers all the appreciated pluses of Alfa Romeo. Anyway C3 Picasso is hard to see as a less worthy vehicle, as Citroen gave out much efforts in the project. The overall match won't form any hesitations about choosing a model.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Citroen C3 Picasso

9 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 90 bhp

88 kw. vs 67 kw.

25% or 30 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 13.5 sec. 4.7 sec.
More top speed 123 mph vs 108 mph 15 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 61.46 mpg 33% or 15.19 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 70.66 mpg 25% or 14.2 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.91 mpg vs 51.42 mpg 47% or 16.51 mpg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1329 kg 16% or 184 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

7 reasons to buy Citroen C3 Picasso

Engine and transmission
More torque 230 nM vs 206 nM 10% or 24 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 74 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 22% or 16 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 500 liters vs 270 liters 46% or 230 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 50 liters vs 45 liters 10% or 5 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 11.3 meters 7% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Citroen C3 Picasso

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1560 cm3 12% or 192 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4078 mm 0% or 15 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1766 mm 3% or 46 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1631 mm 11% or 185 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2540 mm 1% or 29 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 185/60 R15
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 185/60 R15
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)