Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Citroen DS5

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Citroen DS5?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Citroen DS5 might help drivers make it clear which vehicle is more efficient. We found 1 vital reasons why Alfa Romeo Mito is undoubtedly a more beneficial purchase than Citroen DS5. Anyway, Citroen DS5 offers 8 important pluses that make it great purchase instead of Alfa Romeo Mito. We found key options of Alfa Romeo Mito and Citroen DS5 that were employed while comparing. It might help you find the better choice - compare two cars before buying. The best ideas of Alfa Romeo are hidden in Mito. Car owners say that Citroen also did a lot to turn DS5 into a great leader. The overall comparison won't keep any questions about choosing a vehicle.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Citroen DS5

1 reason to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 96 g/mile 7% or 6 g/mile

8 reasons to buy Citroen DS5

Engine and transmission
More engine power

197 bhp vs 120 bhp

vs 88 kw.

39% or 77 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.2 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 0.6 sec.
More top speed 146 mph vs 123 mph 23 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.33 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 18% or 6.94 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 465 liters vs 270 liters 42% or 195 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 45 liters 25% or 15 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.3 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Citroen DS5

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 14% or 230 cm3 less
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4530 mm 10% or 467 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1871 mm 8% or 151 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1539 mm 6% or 93 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2727 mm 8% or 216 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)