Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Kia Soul

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Kia Soul?

Making a choice between Kia Soul and Alfa Romeo Mito could seem difficult, so we'll make comparison of the models. When matching the vehicles, you'll reveal 7 points that take Alfa Romeo Mito to first place in comparison with Kia Soul. Also, Kia Soul provides 13 weighty advantages that turn it into wonderful choice instead of Alfa Romeo Mito. By examining the most valuable features, our team revealed key differences between Alfa Romeo Mito and Kia Soul. You may compare two cars and express your personal view about vehicles. Mito was built by Alfa Romeo to win contestants in the sphere. But remember that Soul has the individual developments of Kia. Which of the models in our review would you buy?


Alfa Romeo Mito Kia Soul

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 10.9 sec. 2.1 sec.
More top speed 123 mph vs 113 mph 10 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 17% or 7.98 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 61.46 mpg 9% or 5 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.91 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 31% or 10.65 mpg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 99441 miles 90% or 894965 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1345 kg 17% or 200 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

13 reasons to buy Kia Soul

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.3 vs 9.8 43% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 77.2 mm vs 72 mm 7% or 5.2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 84.5 mm vs 84 mm 1% or 0.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

126 bhp vs 120 bhp

94 kw. vs 88 kw.

5% or 6 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 260 nM vs 206 nM 21% or 54 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 6% or 5 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 340 liters vs 270 liters 21% or 70 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 48 liters vs 45 liters 6% or 3 liters
More warranty against corrosion 10 years vs 8 years 20% or 2 years
More painted surfaces warranty 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Years 7 years vs 3 years 57% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.5 meters vs 11.3 meters 8% or 0.8 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Kia Soul

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1582 cm3 14% or 214 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4063 mm vs 4105 mm 1% or 42 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1785 mm 4% or 65 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1610 mm 10% or 164 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2550 mm 2% or 39 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 205/55 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 205/55 R16
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)