Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Nissan GT-R

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Nissan GT-R?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Nissan GT-R will help buyers decide which car is more efficient. You can see 7 important arguments why Alfa Romeo Mito is actually a more sensible choice than Nissan GT-R. Although Nissan GT-R also has many pluses: look at 12 factors why it's winning Alfa Romeo Mito. The review of Alfa Romeo Mito and Nissan GT-R takes into account every needed spec and gives data. Compare safety or efficiency, look at length, and comfortably compare two cars. Mito includes all the usual advantages of Alfa Romeo. Nevertheless Nissan doesn't fall behind and presents its best technologies in GT-R. The detailed match can't leave any questions about choosing a car.


Alfa Romeo Mito Nissan GT-R

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.8 vs 9.1 7% or 0.7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 185 g/mile 106% or 95 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 249 liters 8% or 21 liters
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1740 kg 52% or 595 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 11.4 meters 1% or 0.1 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

12 reasons to buy Nissan GT-R

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 95.5 mm vs 72 mm 25% or 23.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 88.4 mm vs 84 mm 5% or 4.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

478 bhp vs 120 bhp

357 kw. vs 88 kw.

75% or 358 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 588 nM vs 206 nM 65% or 382 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 3.5 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 5.3 sec.
More top speed 193 mph vs 123 mph 70 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 22.69 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 104% or 23.58 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 31.01 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 82% or 25.45 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 15.4 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 127% or 19.51 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 73.8 liters vs 45 liters 39% or 28.8 liters
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Nissan GT-R

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6400 RPM 22% or 1400 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 3799 cm3 64% or 2431 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs With a twin-turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Length 4063 mm vs 4650 mm 13% or 587 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1895 mm 9% or 175 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1370 mm 5% or 76 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2780 mm 10% or 269 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 255/40 R20
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 285/35 R20
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 20" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)