Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Opel GT

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Opel GT?

Do you want to find out what car is better: Alfa Romeo Mito or Opel GT? There are 3 weighty ideas why Alfa Romeo Mito is actually a more sensible purchase than Opel GT. Opel GT also offers 9 factors to pick it instead of Alfa Romeo Mito. By examining the most important characteristics, we found evident differences between Alfa Romeo Mito and Opel GT. It might help you find the suitable choice - compare two cars before paying money. Alfa Romeo did everything to present Mito as the most worthwhile car in its class. Motorists agree that Opel also did a lot to turn GT into a great leader. The thorough comparison can't form any questions about deciding on a car.


Alfa Romeo Mito Opel GT

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 135 g/mile 50% or 45 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 66 liters 76% or 204 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1306 kg 14% or 161 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

9 reasons to buy Opel GT

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

264 bhp vs 120 bhp

192 kw. vs 88 kw.

55% or 144 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 353 nM vs 206 nM 42% or 147 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.70 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 3.1 sec.
More top speed 142 mph vs 123 mph 19 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 31.01 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 49% or 15.26 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 40.97 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 38% or 15.49 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.99 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 59% or 12.92 mpg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.40 meters vs 11.3 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Opel GT

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 5300 RPM 6% or 300 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 32% or 630 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4063 mm vs 4100 mm 1% or 37 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1813 mm 5% or 93 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1274 mm 12% or 172 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2415 mm 4% or 96 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 245/45R18
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 245/45R18
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)