Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Peugeot 3008

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Peugeot 3008?

Look at comparison Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Peugeot 3008 by key characteristics. When looking at the models, you'll reveal 3 points that take Alfa Romeo Mito to first place in comparison with Peugeot 3008. Peugeot 3008 still has got 11 reasons to pick it rather than Alfa Romeo Mito. The review of Alfa Romeo Mito and Peugeot 3008 looks at every needed point and shows data. You will compare two cars and find your personal opinion about them. Mito includes all the appreciated benefits of Alfa Romeo. Motorists say that Peugeot also did a lot to turn 3008 into a great leader. After analyzing all the data, you'll quickly decide which vehicle to purchase.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Peugeot 3008

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 8.9 sec. 0.1 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 104 g/mile 16% or 14 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1500 kg 31% or 355 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Peugeot 3008

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 77 mm vs 72 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 85.6 mm vs 84 mm 2% or 1.6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

155 bhp vs 120 bhp

110 kw. vs 88 kw.

23% or 35 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 240 nM vs 206 nM 14% or 34 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
More top speed 125 mph vs 123 mph 2 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.73 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 16% or 6.54 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 50.43 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 12% or 6.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 28.5 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 22% or 6.41 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 512 liters vs 270 liters 47% or 242 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 45 liters 25% or 15 liters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Peugeot 3008

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 17% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 14% or 230 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4365 mm 7% or 302 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1837 mm 6% or 117 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1639 mm 12% or 193 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2613 mm 4% or 102 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 225/50 R17
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 225/50 R17
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)