Last Update: Mar. 31, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Peugeot 407

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Peugeot 407?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Peugeot 407

9 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 10.1 sec. 1.3 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 47.97 mpg 4% or 1.7 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 59 mpg 4% or 2.54 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.91 mpg vs 35.98 mpg 3% or 1.07 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 8% or 7 g/mile
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1650 kg 44% or 505 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 12 meters 6% or 0.7 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

8 reasons to buy Peugeot 407

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 72 mm 15% or 13 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 88 mm vs 84 mm 5% or 4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

136 bhp vs 120 bhp

100 kw. vs 88 kw.

12% or 16 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 206 nM 36% or 114 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
More top speed 129 mph vs 123 mph 6 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 400 liters vs 270 liters 33% or 130 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 67 liters vs 45 liters 33% or 22 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Peugeot 407

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 31% or 629 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4815 mm 16% or 752 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1868 mm 8% or 148 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1399 mm 3% or 47 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2725 mm 8% or 214 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 235/45 R18
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 235/45 R18
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)