Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Renault Twingo

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Renault Twingo?

Do you want to find out what vehicle is more efficient: Alfa Romeo Mito or Renault Twingo? When matching the models, you'll find 7 points that take Alfa Romeo Mito to first place compared to Renault Twingo. Renault Twingo anyway has got 12 ideas to buy it rather than Alfa Romeo Mito. We summarized information about the models to present a fair comparison of Renault Twingo and Alfa Romeo Mito. Take acceleration or horse powers, measure dimensions, and easily compare two cars. Mito was built by Alfa Romeo to outperform contestants on the market. But Renault doesn't give up and offers its new technologies in Twingo. If you had the possibility, which model would you buy?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Renault Twingo

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 84 mm vs 80.5 mm 4% or 3.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 206 nM vs 160 nM 22% or 46 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 96 g/mile 7% or 6 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 165 liters 39% or 105 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 45 liters vs 40 liters 11% or 5 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

12 reasons to buy Renault Twingo

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.0 vs 9.8 11% or 1.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 79.5 mm vs 72 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

133 bhp vs 120 bhp

98 kw. vs 88 kw.

10% or 13 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.7 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 0.1 sec.
More top speed 125 mph vs 123 mph 2 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 42.22 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 10% or 4.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 50.43 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 12% or 6.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 31.38 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 11% or 3.53 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1049 kg vs 1145 kg 9% or 96 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.4 meters vs 11.3 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Renault Twingo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6750 RPM 26% or 1750 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 14% or 230 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 3607 mm 11% or 456 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1688 mm 2% or 32 mm wider
Height 1446 mm vs 1460 mm 1% or 14 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2368 mm 6% or 143 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 195/40 R17
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 195/40 R17
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)