Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Volvo V90

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Volvo V90?

Compare Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Volvo V90 by significant features. When matching the cars, you'll admit 4 factors that put Alfa Romeo Mito to first place compared to Volvo V90. Volvo V90 still shows 6 reasons to pick it rather than Alfa Romeo Mito. By examining the most prominent specs, we revealed evident distinctions of Alfa Romeo Mito and Volvo V90. You can compare two cars and form your personal opinion about vehicles. The freshest technologies of Alfa Romeo are hidden in Mito. Though Volvo doesn't fall behind and offers its new technologies in V90. If you had the possibility, which car would you buy?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Volvo V90

4 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 9.0 sec. 0.2 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 170 g/mile 89% or 80 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1617 kg 41% or 472 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

6 reasons to buy Volvo V90

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

204 bhp vs 120 bhp

vs 88 kw.

41% or 84 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
More top speed 130 mph vs 123 mph 7 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 23.6 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 96% or 22.67 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 45 liters 44% or 35 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 9 meters vs 11.3 meters 26% or 2.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Volvo V90

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 2922 cm3 53% or 1554 cm3 less
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 4 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4876 mm 17% or 813 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1981 mm 13% or 261 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1450 mm 0% or 4 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2770 mm 9% or 259 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)