Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 3-Series and Nissan X-Trail

What is Better BMW 3-Series or Nissan X-Trail?

Choosing for Nissan X-Trail or BMW 3-Series might appear complicated, so we want to make comparison of the vehicles. We found 6 huge arguments why BMW 3-Series is actually a more beneficial purchase than Nissan X-Trail. Nevertheless, Nissan X-Trail shows 6 important advantages that make it good purchase instead of BMW 3-Series. The match of BMW 3-Series and Nissan X-Trail considers every vital factor and summarizes information. So our experts offer visitors compare two cars and figure out which one you'd want to buy. The most effective technical units of BMW are hidden in 3-Series. Motorists admit that Nissan really did a lot to turn X-Trail into a market success. After getting all the information, you'll easily understand which model to buy.

Exterior

BMW 3-Series Nissan X-Trail

6 reasons to buy BMW 3-Series

Engine and transmission
More engine power

181 bhp vs 173 bhp

vs 127 kw.

4% or 8 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.6 sec. vs 10 sec. 2.4 sec.
More top speed 143 mph vs 124 mph 19 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 95 g/mile vs 123 g/mile 29% or 28 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 6 vs EURO 4 2 generations
Other specs
Less weight 1540 kg vs 1651 kg 7% or 111 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

6 reasons to buy Nissan X-Trail

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 39.33 mpg 3% or 1.14 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 603 liters vs 520 liters 14% or 83 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 60 liters 8% or 5 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 695 kg 7% or 55 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1600 kg 27% or 600 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11 meters 2% or 0.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 3-Series vs. Nissan X-Trail

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1997 cm3 vs 1995 cm3 0% or 2 cm3 more
Fuel supply Turbocharged vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4824 mm vs 4630 mm 4% or 194 mm shorter
Width 2047 mm vs 1785 mm 13% or 262 mm wider
Height 1508 mm vs 1685 mm 11% or 177 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2920 mm vs 2630 mm 10% or 290 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)