Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 3-Series and Renault Grand Scenic

What is Better BMW 3-Series or Renault Grand Scenic?

Comparing BMW 3-Series with Renault Grand Scenic can help buyers make decision which car is more efficient. We came up with 8 ideas to choose BMW 3-Series - it's winning Renault Grand Scenic, according to such points. Although Renault Grand Scenic also possesses many advantages: look at 3 factors why it's beating BMW 3-Series. By examining the most important specs, we came up with evident distinctions of BMW 3-Series and Renault Grand Scenic. So we offer everyone compare two cars and find out which vehicle you'd want to possess. BMW did everything to present 3-Series as the most efficient model in its class. After getting all the characteristics, you'll easily figure out which car to buy.


BMW 3-Series Renault Grand Scenic

8 reasons to buy BMW 3-Series

Engine and transmission
More engine power

181 bhp vs 130 bhp

vs 96 kw.

28% or 51 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.6 sec. vs 11.5 sec. 3.9 sec.
More top speed 143 mph vs 119 mph 24 mph
Less CO2 emissions 95 g/mile vs 106 g/mile 12% or 11 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 6 vs EURO 5 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 208 liters 60% or 312 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1300 kg 19% or 300 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.29 meters 3% or 0.29 meters

3 reasons to buy Renault Grand Scenic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 39.33 mpg 3% or 1.14 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 695 kg 7% or 55 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1457 kg vs 1540 kg 6% or 83 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons BMW 3-Series vs. Renault Grand Scenic

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1997 cm3 vs 1397 cm3 30% or 600 cm3 more
Fuel supply Turbocharged vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4824 mm vs 4560 mm 5% or 264 mm shorter
Width 2047 mm vs 1845 mm 10% or 202 mm wider
Height 1508 mm vs 1645 mm 8% or 137 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2920 mm vs 2770 mm 5% or 150 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)