Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Alfa Romeo Crosswagon?

Comparing BMW 5-Series with Alfa Romeo Crosswagon can help you make it clear which model is more efficient. Our research came up with 8 reasons to go for BMW 5-Series - it's better than Alfa Romeo Crosswagon, according to such cases. Alfa Romeo Crosswagon anyway shows 3 ideas to buy it forgetting about BMW 5-Series. Our team summed up data about the vehicles to present a full match of Alfa Romeo Crosswagon and BMW 5-Series. It might help you choose the suitable choice - compare two cars before paying money. But remember that Crosswagon has got the individual technologies of Alfa Romeo.

Exterior

BMW 5-Series Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

8 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 150 bhp

vs 109 kw.

73% or 402 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 10.50 sec. 6.3 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 119 mph 36 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 40 mpg 36% or 10.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 360 liters 31% or 160 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 500 kg 33% or 250 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1450 kg 28% or 550 kg

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Other specs
Less weight 1505 kg vs 1870 kg 24% or 365 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.00 meters vs 12 meters 9% or 1 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1910 cm3 57% or 2485 cm3 more
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 6 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4910 mm vs 4441 mm 10% or 469 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1765 mm 7% or 126 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1497 mm 3% or 41 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2595 mm 12% or 369 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)