Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Cadillac CTS

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Cadillac CTS?

Comparing BMW 5-Series with Cadillac CTS may help you make it clear which car is worth buying. The comparison came up with 10 factors to purchase BMW 5-Series - it's beating Cadillac CTS, according to such cases. But Cadillac CTS also has many advantages: think about 2 ideas why it's winning BMW 5-Series. By comparing the most prominent characteristics, our team revealed key differences of BMW 5-Series and Cadillac CTS. Choose steering or efficiency, look at wheel base, and comfortably compare two cars. BMW did a lot to present 5-Series as the most efficient vehicle in its competitive section. Though Cadillac doesn't fall behind and presents its new technologies in CTS. After analyzing all the specs, you'll quickly figure out which car to buy.


BMW 5-Series Cadillac CTS

10 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 6 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 211 bhp

vs 155 kw.

62% or 341 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 9 sec. 4.8 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 127 mph 28 mph
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 163 g/mile 13% or 19 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 373 liters 28% or 147 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 68 liters 15% or 12 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 454 kg 39% or 296 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1814 kg 9% or 186 kg

2 reasons to buy Cadillac CTS

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 25.71 mpg vs 29.5 mpg 15% or 3.79 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1775 kg vs 1870 kg 5% or 95 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Cadillac CTS

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 2792 cm3 36% or 1603 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 6 1 more
Length 4910 mm vs 4860 mm 1% or 50 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1842 mm 3% or 49 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1464 mm 1% or 8 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2880 mm 3% or 84 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)