Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Daewoo Evanda

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Daewoo Evanda?

Look at comparison BMW 5-Series vs. Daewoo Evanda by significant specs. We revealed 8 factors to go for BMW 5-Series - it's winning Daewoo Evanda, according to these points. Daewoo Evanda still has got 4 factors to pick it forgetting about BMW 5-Series. We summed up data about the models to present a full match of Daewoo Evanda with BMW 5-Series. Choose speed or fuel consumption, measure wheel base, and comfortably compare two cars. BMW did great work to present 5-Series as the most worthwhile car in its competitive section. Though Evanda is hard to call a worse model, as Daewoo gave out a great deal of efforts in the project. If you had the opportunity, which model would you buy?


BMW 5-Series Daewoo Evanda

8 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 131 bhp

vs 95 kw.

76% or 421 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 10.70 sec. 6.5 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 124 mph 31 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 31.98 mpg 8% or 2.48 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 420 liters 19% or 100 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

4 reasons to buy Daewoo Evanda

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Less CO2 emissions 132 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 9% or 12 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1422 kg vs 1870 kg 32% or 448 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.40 meters vs 12 meters 15% or 1.6 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Daewoo Evanda

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 55% or 2397 cm3 more
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 5 2 more
Length 4910 mm vs 4770 mm 3% or 140 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1815 mm 4% or 76 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1440 mm 1% or 16 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2700 mm 9% or 264 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)