Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Ford Cougar

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Ford Cougar?

Do you wish to understand what model wins: BMW 5-Series or Ford Cougar? You can see 8 weighty ideas why BMW 5-Series is actually a more sensible buy than Ford Cougar. For plenty of buyers, Ford Cougar may still appear a more suitable choice than BMW 5-Series as there are 3 reasons of it. We gathered information about the models to present a fair comparison of Ford Cougar and BMW 5-Series. So our experts offer everyone compare two cars and decide which vehicle you'd like to purchase. 5-Series was produced by BMW to outperform contestants in the sphere. Though take into account that Cougar has got the unique technologies of Ford. After summarizing all the specs, you'll easily decide which car to buy.

Exterior

BMW 5-Series Ford Cougar

8 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 130 bhp

vs 96 kw.

76% or 422 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 9.6 sec. 5.4 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 130 mph 25 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 33.19 mpg 13% or 3.69 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 60.5 liters 24% or 19.5 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

3 reasons to buy Ford Cougar

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 127 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 13% or 17 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1291 kg vs 1870 kg 45% or 579 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 12 meters 6% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Ford Cougar

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1989 cm3 55% or 2406 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 5 2 more
Dimensions
Length 4910 mm vs 4699 mm 4% or 211 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1769 mm 6% or 122 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1326 mm 9% or 130 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2704 mm 9% or 260 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)