Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Renault Clio

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Renault Clio?

Comparing BMW 5-Series with Renault Clio may help you make it clear which model is better. Our table reveals 9 points which make BMW 5-Series better than Renault Clio. Anyway, Renault Clio shows 3 strong benefits that show it as a good choice instead of BMW 5-Series. There are major specs of BMW 5-Series and Renault Clio that were taken into account when matching. You can compare two cars and find your personal view about models. 5-Series offers all the appreciated advantages of BMW. But Renault doesn't lag behind and presents its new technologies in Clio. The thorough comparison can't leave any doubts about deciding on a vehicle.


BMW 5-Series Renault Clio

9 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 3 5 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 88 bhp


84% or 464 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 7.6 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 113 mph 42 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 59 mpg 100% or 29.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 300 liters 42% or 220 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 45 liters 44% or 35 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 540 kg 28% or 210 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 900 kg 55% or 1100 kg

3 reasons to buy Renault Clio

Less CO2 emissions 65 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 122% or 79 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1009 kg vs 1870 kg 85% or 861 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 12 meters 20% or 2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Renault Clio

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 898 cm3 80% or 3497 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 5 2 more
Length 4910 mm vs 4062 mm 17% or 848 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1945 mm 3% or 54 mm narrower
Height 1456 mm vs 1448 mm 1% or 8 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2589 mm 13% or 375 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)