Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 6-Series and Cadillac CTS

What is Better BMW 6-Series or Cadillac CTS?

Comparing BMW 6-Series with Cadillac CTS can help drivers make decision which model is more efficient. We found 8 weighty reasons why BMW 6-Series is surely a more beneficial purchase than Cadillac CTS. Cadillac CTS anyway has got 2 factors to purchase it forgetting about BMW 6-Series. By examining the most prominent characteristics, we revealed key distinctions between BMW 6-Series and Cadillac CTS. So our experts suggest that everyone compare two cars and find out which vehicle you'd like to buy.

Exterior

BMW 6-Series Cadillac CTS

8 reasons to buy BMW 6-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 6 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 211 bhp

vs 155 kw.

62% or 341 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.1 sec. vs 9 sec. 4.9 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 127 mph 28 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 163 g/mile 13% or 19 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 373 liters 19% or 87 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 68 liters 15% or 12 liters

2 reasons to buy Cadillac CTS

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 25.71 mpg vs 29.5 mpg 15% or 3.79 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1775 kg vs 1875 kg 6% or 100 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons BMW 6-Series vs. Cadillac CTS

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 2792 cm3 36% or 1603 cm3 more
Fuel supply Multi-point injection fuel vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 6 1 more
Dimensions
Length 5011 mm vs 4860 mm 3% or 151 mm shorter
Width 1899 mm vs 1842 mm 3% or 57 mm wider
Height 1393 mm vs 1464 mm 5% or 71 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2880 mm 3% or 84 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)