Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 6-Series and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

What is Better BMW 6-Series or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo?

Comparing BMW 6-Series with Mitsubishi Lancer Evo will help people make it clear which car is worth buying. Our research revealed 6 factors to go for BMW 6-Series - it's beating Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, according to such arguments. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo also has got 3 reasons to purchase it rather than BMW 6-Series. We gathered information about the cars to present a fair comparison of Mitsubishi Lancer Evo with BMW 6-Series. Compare acceleration or fuel consumption, look at dimensions, and conveniently compare two cars. BMW did a lot to present 6-Series as the most efficient car in its class. Car owners agree that Mitsubishi also did a lot to turn Lancer Evo into a great success. Which of the contestants in our match would you choose?

Exterior

BMW 6-Series Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

6 reasons to buy BMW 6-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 290 bhp

vs 217 kw.

47% or 262 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.1 sec. vs 4.7 sec. 0.6 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 153 g/mile 6% or 9 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 55 liters 31% or 25 liters

3 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 27.41 mpg vs 29.5 mpg 8% or 2.09 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1875 kg 20% or 315 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.8 meters vs 12 meters 2% or 0.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 6-Series vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 55% or 2397 cm3 more
Fuel supply Multi-point injection fuel vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 5 2 more
Dimensions
Length 5011 mm vs 4495 mm 10% or 516 mm shorter
Width 1899 mm vs 1810 mm 5% or 89 mm wider
Height 1393 mm vs 1480 mm 6% or 87 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2650 mm 11% or 314 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)