Last Update: Apr. 03, 2020, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 7-Series and Chevrolet Camaro

What is Better BMW 7-Series or Chevrolet Camaro?

Comparing BMW 7-Series with Chevrolet Camaro might help people make it clear which car is more efficient. We came up with 4 ideas to purchase BMW 7-Series - it's winning Chevrolet Camaro, according to these arguments. But Chevrolet Camaro also has some advantages: get to know 6 points why it's beating BMW 7-Series. We found key features of BMW 7-Series and Chevrolet Camaro that were taken into account when matching. It might help you choose the suitable option - compare two cars before making decision. BMW did great work to introduce 7-Series as the best vehicle in its competitive section. Though don't forget that Camaro presents the unique technologies of Chevrolet.

Exterior

BMW 7-Series Chevrolet Camaro

4 reasons to buy BMW 7-Series

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 204 g/mile 42% or 60 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 500 liters vs 384 liters 23% or 116 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 82 liters vs 72 liters 12% or 10 liters

6 reasons to buy Chevrolet Camaro

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 6 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

425 bhp vs 326 bhp

vs 240 kw.

23% or 99 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.0 sec. vs 5.9 sec. 0.9 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 19.67 mpg vs 28.5 mpg 45% or 8.83 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1769 kg vs 1860 kg 5% or 91 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 12.2 meters 11% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 7-Series vs. Chevrolet Camaro

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 2979 cm3 vs 6162 cm3 52% or 3183 cm3 less
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 5072 mm vs 4837 mm 5% or 235 mm shorter
Width 1902 mm vs 1917 mm 1% or 15 mm narrower
Height 1479 mm vs 1360 mm 8% or 119 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 3070 mm vs 2852 mm 7% or 218 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)