Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 7-Series and Mazda RX-8

What is Better BMW 7-Series or Mazda RX-8?

Comparing BMW 7-Series with Mazda RX-8 may help people make it clear which model is more efficient. We found 16 vital reasons why BMW 7-Series is surely a more advantageous purchase than Mazda RX-8. But Mazda RX-8 also has a lot of advantages: think about 6 factors why it's beating BMW 7-Series. By looking at the most valuable specs, we found the main distinctions of BMW 7-Series and Mazda RX-8. It will help you choose the suitable option - compare two cars before buying. The freshest technical units of BMW are included in 7-Series. After summarizing all the data, you'll easily decide which vehicle to get.

Exterior

BMW 7-Series Mazda RX-8

16 reasons to buy BMW 7-Series

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.2 vs 10 2% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

326 bhp vs 192 bhp

240 kw. vs 141 kw.

41% or 134 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 450 nM vs 220 nM 51% or 230 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.9 sec. vs 7.2 sec. 1.3 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 139 mph 16 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 166 g/mile 15% or 22 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 500 liters vs 290 liters 42% or 210 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 82 liters vs 61 liters 26% or 21 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 1815 kg 28% or 690 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 645 kg vs 425 kg 34% or 220 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2100 kg vs 1200 kg 43% or 900 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

6 reasons to buy Mazda RX-8

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 26.19 mpg vs 28.5 mpg 9% or 2.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.01 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 9% or 3.21 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 18.7 mpg vs 20.5 mpg 10% or 1.8 mpg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
Less weight 1390 kg vs 1860 kg 34% or 470 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 12.2 meters 15% or 1.6 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 7-Series vs. Mazda RX-8

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5800 RPM vs 7000 RPM 17% or 1200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 2979 cm3 vs 1308 cm3 56% or 1671 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs Rotating cylinder block
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 5072 mm vs 4430 mm 13% or 642 mm shorter
Width 1902 mm vs 1780 mm 6% or 122 mm wider
Height 1479 mm vs 1340 mm 9% or 139 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 3070 mm vs 2700 mm 12% or 370 mm more
Front tires size 245/50 R18 vs 225/45R18
Rear tires size 245/50 R18 vs 225/45R18
Spare wheel flat tires vs welds
Type of wheels 18" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes Style 234 vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)