Last Update: Apr. 02, 2020, 5:43 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 7-Series and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

What is Better BMW 7-Series or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo?

Exterior

BMW 7-Series Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

10 reasons to buy BMW 7-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 10.2 vs 9.0 12% or 1.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 89.6 mm vs 86 mm 4% or 3.6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

326 bhp vs 290 bhp

240 kw. vs 217 kw.

11% or 36 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 450 nM vs 407 nM 10% or 43 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 144 g/mile vs 153 g/mile 6% or 9 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 82 liters vs 55 liters 33% or 27 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 2040 kg 19% or 465 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 645 kg vs 480 kg 26% or 165 kg

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 84 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.7 sec. vs 5.9 sec. 1.2 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 27.41 mpg vs 28.5 mpg 4% or 1.09 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.91 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 7% or 2.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 19.9 mpg vs 20.5 mpg 3% or 0.6 mpg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1860 kg 19% or 300 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.8 meters vs 12.2 meters 3% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 7-Series vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5800 RPM vs 6500 RPM 11% or 700 less rpms.
Engine capacity 2979 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 33% or 981 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC VVT
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 5072 mm vs 4495 mm 11% or 577 mm shorter
Width 1902 mm vs 1810 mm 5% or 92 mm wider
Height 1479 mm vs 1480 mm 0% or 1 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 3070 mm vs 2650 mm 14% or 420 mm more
Front tires size 245/50 R18 vs 245/40 R18
Rear tires size 245/50 R18 vs 245/40 R18
Spare wheel flat tires vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 18" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes Style 234 vs ENKEI
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)