Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Cadillac CTS

What is Better BMW Alpina or Cadillac CTS?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Cadillac CTS will help people make it clear which vehicle is better. The comparison came up with 10 ideas to buy BMW Alpina - it's better than Cadillac CTS, according to these specs. Cadillac CTS also has got 11 factors to buy it forgetting about BMW Alpina. We summarized information about the vehicles to introduce a full match of Cadillac CTS with BMW Alpina. Alpina was built by BMW to outperform competitions in the sphere. Though don't forget that CTS has the individual developments of Cadillac. After getting all the characteristics, you'll easily understand which vehicle to buy.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Cadillac CTS

10 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.5 44% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 74.8 mm 17% or 15.2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 410 nM vs 246 nM 40% or 164 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 9 sec. 1.6 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 127 mph 18 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 163 g/mile 68% or 66 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 373 liters 19% or 87 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 454 kg 39% or 291 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 1775 kg 22% or 315 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Cadillac CTS

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 89 mm vs 84 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

211 bhp vs 200 bhp

155 kw. vs 147 kw.

5% or 11 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 25.71 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 86% or 22.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.7 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 64% or 23.35 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 16.8 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 113% or 19.01 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 68 liters vs 61 liters 10% or 7 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2360 kg vs 1980 kg 16% or 380 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 585 kg vs 520 kg 11% or 65 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1814 kg vs 1600 kg 12% or 214 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Cadillac CTS

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6800 RPM 41% or 2800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2792 cm3 29% or 797 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4860 mm 7% or 340 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1842 mm 1% or 25 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1464 mm 3% or 51 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2880 mm 4% or 120 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 235/50 R18
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 235/50 R18
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs Compact
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)