Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Dodge Avenger

What is Better BMW Alpina or Dodge Avenger?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Dodge Avenger might help drivers make decision which vehicle is worth buying. Our research revealed 13 ideas to purchase BMW Alpina - it's above Dodge Avenger, according to the points. Though Dodge Avenger also possesses many pluses: think about 11 factors why it's winning BMW Alpina. We found major options of BMW Alpina and Dodge Avenger which were taken into account when comparing. So we suggest that everyone compare two cars and make up your mind which vehicle you'd want to buy.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Dodge Avenger

13 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 81 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 138 bhp

147 kw. vs 103 kw.

31% or 62 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 310 nM 24% or 100 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 12 sec. 4.6 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 126 mph 19 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 106 g/mile 9% or 9 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 441 liters 4% or 19 liters
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 405 kg 22% or 115 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 450 kg 40% or 295 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1350 kg 16% or 250 kg
More maximum roof load 75 kg vs 68 kg 9% or 7 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 1635 kg 12% or 175 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Dodge Avenger

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.0 vs 17.0 6% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 90 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 45.56 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 5% or 2.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 55.4 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 8% or 4.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.4 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 4% or 1.41 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 70 dB vs 74 dB 6% or 4 dB
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 64.3 liters vs 61 liters 5% or 3.3 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2040 kg vs 1980 kg 3% or 60 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 7 years vs 6 years 14% or 1 years
More painted surfaces warranty 7 years vs 3 years 57% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Dodge Avenger

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1968 cm3 1% or 27 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4850 mm 7% or 330 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1843 mm 1% or 26 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1497 mm 6% or 84 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2765 mm 0% or 5 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs Compact
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 17" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)