Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Honda HR-V

What is Better BMW Alpina or Honda HR-V?

Exterior

BMW Alpina Honda HR-V

15 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.6 44% or 7.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 75 mm 11% or 9 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 105 bhp

147 kw. vs 77 kw.

48% or 95 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 135 nM 67% or 275 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 13.2 sec. 5.8 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 94 mph 51 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 125 g/mile 29% or 28 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 285 liters 38% or 175 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 55 liters 10% or 6 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 500 kg 33% or 245 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 800 kg 50% or 800 kg
More maximum roof load 75 kg vs 60 kg 20% or 15 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 93226 miles 91% or 901180 miles

6 reasons to buy Honda HR-V

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 33.62 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 42% or 14.25 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 37.22 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 61% or 22.83 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 27.19 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 32% or 8.62 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 71.2 dB vs 74 dB 4% or 2.8 dB
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1291 kg vs 1460 kg 13% or 169 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Honda HR-V

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6200 RPM 35% or 2200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1590 cm3 20% or 405 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4010 mm 11% or 510 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1695 mm 7% or 122 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1700 mm 17% or 287 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2350 mm 15% or 410 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 205/60 R16
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 205/60 R16
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs Compact
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 16 x 6JJ alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)