Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Land Rover Range Rover Sport

What is Better BMW Alpina or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

Look at match of BMW Alpina vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport by key specs. When comparing the vehicles, buyers will find 9 points that put BMW Alpina to first place when comparing it with Land Rover Range Rover Sport. For a lot of buyers, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can still appear a better choice than BMW Alpina as we found 13 factors of it. There are key options of BMW Alpina and Land Rover Range Rover Sport that were applied when comparing. So our experts offer you compare two cars and find out which model you'd want to buy. Alpina offers all the appreciated advantages of BMW. But Land Rover doesn't lag behind and offers its best developments in Range Rover Sport. The overall match can't leave any hesitations about choosing a car.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Land Rover Range Rover Sport

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 8 53% or 9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 81 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 88 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 188 bhp

147 kw. vs 140 kw.

6% or 12 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.9 sec. 4.5 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 120 mph 25 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 165 g/mile 70% or 68 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 2455 kg 68% or 995 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 11.6 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

13 reasons to buy Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More torque 440 nM vs 410 nM 7% or 30 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 28.3 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 69% or 19.57 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.4 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 75% or 25.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.59 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 66% or 14.22 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 72 dB vs 74 dB 3% or 2 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 958 liters vs 460 liters 52% or 498 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 84.1 liters vs 61 liters 27% or 23.1 liters
More maximum allowable weight 3070 kg vs 1980 kg 36% or 1090 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 615 kg vs 520 kg 15% or 95 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 745 kg 1% or 5 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 3500 kg vs 1600 kg 54% or 1900 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2720 cm3 27% or 725 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4798 mm 6% or 278 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1928 mm 6% or 111 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1812 mm 22% or 399 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2745 mm 1% or 15 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 255/55 R18
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 255/55 R18
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 255/55 R18
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)