Last Update: Apr. 03, 2020, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Peugeot 206

What is Better BMW Alpina or Peugeot 206?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Peugeot 206 may help drivers decide which model is better. We came up with 16 ideas to go for BMW Alpina - it's beating Peugeot 206, according to these points. Peugeot 206 anyway shows 7 factors to buy it rather than BMW Alpina. By examining the most valuable features, we found the main differences of BMW Alpina and Peugeot 206. You can compare two cars and express your personal view about them. Alpina was built by BMW to win competitors on the market.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Peugeot 206

16 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 88 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 90 bhp

147 kw. vs 66 kw.

55% or 110 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 205 nM 50% or 205 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 4.4 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 114 mph 31 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.87 mpg vs 55.4 mpg 16% or 7.53 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 60.05 mpg vs 68.8 mpg 15% or 8.75 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.81 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 16% or 5.67 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 313 liters 32% or 147 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 50 liters 18% or 11 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1611 kg 19% or 369 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 420 kg 19% or 100 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1100 kg 31% or 500 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

7 reasons to buy Peugeot 206

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 84 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 13% or 11 g/mile
Less noise level 72.1 dB vs 74 dB 3% or 1.9 dB
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1191 kg vs 1460 kg 23% or 269 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.85 meters vs 11.1 meters 13% or 1.25 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Peugeot 206

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 0% or 2 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4028 mm 11% or 492 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1652 mm 9% or 165 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1460 mm 3% or 47 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2442 mm 12% or 318 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 165/85 R14
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 165/85 R14
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 165/85 R14
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 14" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)