Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Volkswagen Polo

What is Better BMW Alpina or Volkswagen Polo?

Look at match of BMW Alpina vs. Volkswagen Polo by all-important specs. When looking at the vehicles, you'll admit 7 factors that take BMW Alpina to first place in comparison with Volkswagen Polo. Anyway, Volkswagen Polo shows 7 strong advantages that show it as a wonderful buy instead of BMW Alpina. The review of BMW Alpina with Volkswagen Polo takes into account every important feature and sums up information. Take steering or horse powers, measure length, and easily compare two cars. Alpina was produced by BMW to outperform competitions in the class. But Polo is hard to see as a less worthy model, as Volkswagen invested much money in the production. If you had the chance, which model would you buy?


BMW Alpina Volkswagen Polo

7 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More engine power

200 bhp vs 180 bhp

147 kw. vs 132 kw.

10% or 20 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 250 nM 39% or 160 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
More top speed 145 mph vs 142 mph 3 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.81 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 5% or 1.89 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 280 liters 39% or 180 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 45 liters 26% or 16 liters
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

7 reasons to buy Volkswagen Polo

Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.9 sec. vs 7.4 sec. 0.5 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 55.4 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 8% or 4.65 mpg
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 13% or 11 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 11.1 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Volkswagen Polo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6200 RPM 35% or 2200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1390 cm3 30% or 605 cm3 more
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Turbocharged and supercharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 7 1 less
Length 4520 mm vs 3870 mm 14% or 650 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1682 mm 7% or 135 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1485 mm 5% or 72 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2470 mm 11% or 290 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 215/40 R17
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 215/40 R17
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs Compact
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)