Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz CLC

What is Better BMW X1 or Mercedes-Benz CLC?

Comparing BMW X1 with Mercedes-Benz CLC can help you decide which model is worth buying. You can see 14 weighty arguments why BMW X1 is surely a more effective purchase than Mercedes-Benz CLC. But Mercedes-Benz CLC also has got many advantages: look at 8 points why it's winning BMW X1. We summarized data about the cars to provide a full comparison of Mercedes-Benz CLC with BMW X1. But don't forget that CLC has the effective developments of Mercedes-Benz.

Exterior

BMW X1 Mercedes-Benz CLC

14 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 9.3 44% or 7.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 82 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 85 mm 6% or 5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 320 nM vs 220 nM 31% or 100 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 9.7 sec. 0.1 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 113 g/mile 33% or 28 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 420 liters vs 320 liters 24% or 100 liters
More maximum trunk space 1350 liters vs 730 liters 46% or 620 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1945 kg 4% or 85 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 470 kg 16% or 90 kg
Service cycle
More service interval - Mileage 37290 miles vs 15538 miles 58% or 21752 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1475 kg 0% or 5 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

8 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz CLC

Performance
More top speed 137 mph vs 124 mph 13 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 37.22 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 46% or 17.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 45.56 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 32% or 14.49 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 27.7 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 67% or 18.57 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 62 liters vs 61 liters 2% or 1 liters
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 30 years vs 6 years 80% or 24 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.76 meters vs 11.3 meters 5% or 0.54 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Mercedes-Benz CLC

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5200 RPM 23% or 1200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1796 cm3 10% or 199 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs With a mechanical supercharger
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4448 mm 0% or 6 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1728 mm 4% or 70 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1405 mm 9% or 140 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2715 mm 2% or 45 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 225/40 R18
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 245/35 R18
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs Compact
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs 5 double spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)