Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Mitsubishi Galant

What is Better BMW X1 or Mitsubishi Galant?

Comparing BMW X1 with Mitsubishi Galant may help drivers make it clear which model is more efficient. You can see 6 weighty ideas why BMW X1 is surely a more sensible buy than Mitsubishi Galant. Nevertheless, Mitsubishi Galant offers 8 weighty benefits that turn it into good purchase instead of BMW X1. We found major characteristics of BMW X1 and Mitsubishi Galant that were used when comparing. It will help you choose the suitable vehicle - compare two cars before buying. The best ideas of BMW are presented in X1. Though Mitsubishi doesn't fall behind and offers its best technologies in Galant. If you had the possibility, which car would you choose?

Exterior

BMW X1 Mitsubishi Galant

6 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 8.5 48% or 8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 81 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 80.8 mm 10% or 9.2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1550 kg 5% or 80 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Galant

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

280 bhp vs 143 bhp

vs 105 kw.

49% or 137 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.9 sec. vs 9.6 sec. 3.7 sec.
More top speed 150 mph vs 124 mph 26 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.49 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 152% or 32.76 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.7 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 125% or 33.35 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 15.9 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 191% or 30.37 mpg
Other specs
Less turning radius 5.8 meters vs 11.3 meters 95% or 5.5 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Mitsubishi Galant

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5500 RPM 27% or 1500 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2498 cm3 20% or 503 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4680 mm 5% or 226 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1760 mm 2% or 38 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1420 mm 8% or 125 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2635 mm 5% or 125 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/55 ZR16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/55 ZR16
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 205/55 ZR16
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)