Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Suzuki Baleno

What is Better BMW X1 or Suzuki Baleno?

Comparing BMW X1 with Suzuki Baleno can help buyers decide which model is better. We came up with 13 factors to go for BMW X1 - it's beating Suzuki Baleno, according to the cases. For plenty of buyers, Suzuki Baleno may still be a more suitable choice than BMW X1 because we found 5 ideas of it. We gathered data about the models to present a full match of Suzuki Baleno with BMW X1. Choose safety or fuel consumption, match wheel base, and comfortably compare two cars. The best technical units of BMW are hidden in X1. But Suzuki doesn't lag behind and includes its new technologies in Baleno. Which of the cars in our comparison would you buy?


BMW X1 Suzuki Baleno

13 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 9.5 42% or 7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 75 mm 11% or 9 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 95.8 bhp

105 kw. vs 70.5 kw.

33% or 47.2 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 134 nM 58% or 186 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 11.5 sec. 1.9 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 108 mph 16 mph
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 111 g/mile 31% or 26 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 51 liters 16% or 10 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1560 kg 23% or 470 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 400 kg 47% or 350 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1200 kg 33% or 600 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

5 reasons to buy Suzuki Baleno

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 42% or 16.06 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 34% or 15.27 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.99 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 54% or 16.28 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1035 kg vs 1470 kg 42% or 435 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.8 meters vs 11.3 meters 15% or 1.5 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Suzuki Baleno

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1590 cm3 20% or 405 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Length 4454 mm vs 4345 mm 2% or 109 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1690 mm 6% or 108 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1460 mm 6% or 85 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2480 mm 10% or 280 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 175/70 R13 82H
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 175/70 R13 82H
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 175/70 R13 82H
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 13 X steel
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs covers
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)